Canadian Soldiers Assistance Team (CSAT) Forum

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Rags on Tue 16 Apr 2013, 11:03

Nailed Robbie, contrary to MC comments in court this was a difficult case it was not it was shit simple. Problem was the GOC is a big bully and some are affraid to fight it. This was probably the simplest case in Class Action history. Proof is out of pocket expenses to fight case was according the MC on the radio in December about 100k plus the pay of 3 lawyers (part time) over a couple years.

Even the main reason they won the argument in law was shit simple. If you were at the court 14 feb you will remember the BC lawyer Ward Branch praise up the moment they knew they had the case won. He claimed it was a Urika moment out of the blue one night by the young lawyer in 09 (forget his name Dan I think). It was during a late night difficult planning session...cause they were working so hard on it. He further claimed thats why they get paid the big money for this case cause you are paying for legal expertise to figure that stuff out. It was Ward Branches argument for the high fees to the Judge. Some moment I sent the exact legal argument to them in my first e mail back in 08. It did not take me long to find the key legal argument and I'm nobody.

Rags
CSAT Member

Number of posts : 792
Location : Adrift
Registration date : 2013-01-06

Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Mon 15 Apr 2013, 17:54

I certainly agree Rex, I am wondering why the posturing now is this game not over. I wonder who really has a greater investment in this game, certainly not the GOC or they would have jumped in by now, certainly not SISIP as they have known for years that this whole freak show was illegal, and that leaves us, ok that was dumb, so why the delay I assume it has a lot to do with how many people can be notified by our legal team I guess playing with numbers 7500 of them and actually accounting for them real time has proven too much of a challenge for ur legal beagles. Probably the first real challenge in 5 years, just a theory, no offence anyone.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by bigrex on Mon 15 Apr 2013, 14:33

DJ, waiting until the payments are getting ready to be sent before requesting a signed address form, and then making it a prerequisite to getting paid, may not be a delay tactic, but it is an unnecessary delay none the less. They could have sent out these forms over the last several months, but instead they chose to wait. Why they chose to do things this way, only the lawyers know for sure.
bigrex
bigrex
CSAT Member

Number of posts : 4009
Location : Halifax, Nova Scotia
Registration date : 2008-09-18

Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Mon 15 Apr 2013, 11:32

and why would they be stalling?? THEY DONT HAVE THE MONEY YET! stop your paranoying...its bad for your health
why would they have a delay tactic? they want to get paid too! no?

And for the owed amount, you pay 8% on what you paid back not what you owe

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by rzm71 on Mon 15 Apr 2013, 10:15

yep I agree ...
this is just them stalling ....
rzm71
rzm71
CSAT Member

Number of posts : 133
Age : 54
Location : saint john N.B
Registration date : 2013-02-15

Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Sat 13 Apr 2013, 19:54

It will be nice to get some sort of memo, because mailing ths address confirmation out just gives MC another 2 weeks time to figure things out. Sisip is ready , has the calculations , it's up to MC to get this rolling. Sisip has my address, they sent a letter to me every month, this is just a delay tactic for what I am not sure!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by bigrex on Sat 13 Apr 2013, 19:49

Nav, I can't see that happening. SISIP can't say a Veteran should have paid money back to them, thus the retro should be higher, and therefor more legal fees. Basically, SISIP should send the balance owing to MC, and that is the amount legal fees are taken from. If the money is already in your pocket, then that is where it should stay.
bigrex
bigrex
CSAT Member

Number of posts : 4009
Location : Halifax, Nova Scotia
Registration date : 2008-09-18

Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Sat 13 Apr 2013, 15:34

From what Peter said I believe anyone who owes sisip money will have to pay 8 percent legal fees on the amount!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Proudtele on Fri 12 Apr 2013, 20:40

That also answers the question "Are they taking 8% from the interest as well?"

His wording looks like it does.

Proudtele
CSAT Member

Number of posts : 14
Location : Morinville
Registration date : 2012-09-26

Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Fri 12 Apr 2013, 20:11

Thanks Teen,For helping clear up some of the confusion, around some of the new issues.

Sparrow thank you for your continued support and time spent re-searching
for the good of all of us.

Cheers
John.

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Fri 12 Apr 2013, 18:40

HST is a bitch!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Fri 12 Apr 2013, 18:39

Thanks, Propat, I am worried for you guys in New Bruinswick, i heard no Canada Post there, Peter just wraps the memo around an arrow and shoots it into the swamp!

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Fri 12 Apr 2013, 17:58

nav buds yes they can only charge on legal fees not on the entire retro.

propat

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Fri 12 Apr 2013, 17:55

Is the HST on legal fee deduction amount only?

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Guest on Fri 12 Apr 2013, 17:52

Thanks Teen ~

Guest
Guest


Back to top Go down

NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET Empty Re: NEW ENTRY ON COURT DOCKET

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 4 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum