Judge-in-wounded-veterans-case

This court case is controlled by the justice department just like the sisip adjudication. Our beef was with Manulife but who came to the rescue, justice department lawyers! We were employees of the government and who supplied lawyer's to fight us and in my opinion control the adjudication same as their controlling the court system. The judge should have made a ruling year's ago. This is not a legal system it's an injustice department system and the court's are playing their game and so are lawyers in my opinion...

http://www.ctvnews.ca/video?clipId=1155971
Background to the court process.
Wondering why there is such a backlog?
Thanks to this gentleman, we've received more insight of how the upper echelons mechanism works? (Executive Branch)
The Power of money.
Guessing this sounds all to familiar to the older ladies and gentleman on this forum.

I do trust him Danny because his specialty is law and he understands it because he worked his way up from legal aid to lawyer to judge.

Not all decisions have to be made from someone with a military background.

teentitan wrote:This could be a really interesting decision and not just for veterans.  

If the judge  rules against the gov't then the implication is this to ALL politicians...If you make a campaign promise you are legally bound to keep said promise.  

How many times have we said this?  If they make a promise then keep it.  I could be wrong but this is a huge game changer in the future.

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, will you?

"I could be wrong but this is a huge game changer in the future" , hope so teentitan!

This could be a really interesting decision and not just for veterans.

If the judge rules against the gov't then the implication is this to ALL politicians...If you make a campaign promise you are legally bound to keep said promise.

How many times have we said this? If they make a promise then keep it. I could be wrong but this is a huge game changer in the future.

Dannypaj

POINTING OUT THE OBVIOUS
WHO'S this man to judge members of the Military?
No military experience, equates lack of proper judgment. IMO

Danny respect the position not the man. He follows the law as we used to follow Government Orders. Gov't Orders from politicians who had no military experience but we followed the orders because we were trained to do the job.

Hon. Mr. Justice Harvey Groberman

Adjunct Professor

Harvey Groberman
Faculty of Law
University of Victoria
PO Box 1700, STN CSC
Victoria, BC  V8W 2Y2
Map

Harvey Groberman is a judge of the Court of Appeal of British Columbia and the Court of Appeal of the Yukon Territory and a Deputy Judge of the Supreme Court of the Yukon Territory. He was appointed to the B.C. Supreme Court in 2001, to the Yukon Supreme Court in 2005, and to the B.C. and Yukon Courts of Appeal in 2008.

Prior to becoming a judge, Mr. Justice Groberman was a civil litigator who appeared frequently before trial and appellate courts and administrative tribunals. He practiced with the Attorney General of British Columbia and with Davis & Company (as it was then known) in the fields of civil litigation and constitutional and administrative law, He was called to the British Columbia bar in 1985, and was made a Queen’s Counsel in 1999. He taught administrative law at the University of Victoria for several years, and now teaches statutory interpretation at the University of British Columbia and University of Victoria.

Mr. Justice Groberman received a B.A. from the University of Alberta in 1979, a J.D. from the University of Toronto in 1982, and an M.Litt. in law from the University of Oxford in 1989.

Mr. Justice Groberman has written and presented papers on a variety of topics at conferences presented by the Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, the Canadian Bar Association, the National Justice Institute and other organizations.

Education
◾BA – University of Alberta (1979)
◾JD – University of Toronto (1982)
◾M. Litt. (Law) – University of Oxford (1989)

Missing/lack of Qualification: Military Experience


POINTING OUT THE OBVIOUS
WHO'S this man to judge members of the Military?  
No military experience, equates lack of proper judgment. IMO