Is this a DONE DEAL

Proud as Hell, to have you here with us too WhiteWingedWarrior.

Thank you Call of Duty for your service and to all veterans I thank you for your service and I would be proud as hell to have you all as part of a huge patrol and actually recce the undisclosed disclosure package we are paying for but have not yet received. I omitted the term "sacrifice" from my praise to you soldiers as I feel that the government has failed to see it as a sacrifice, yet.

ya lets face it the QRLSP calculations will be of no benifit to the vast majority of the class.

propat

Yes thats basically , In a Military observation, how this may have all played out! I enjoyed your analogy WhiteWingedWarrior.

I know they had CRA representation but as far as the QRLSP queries I would hope so but then and again, just because the patrol was successful does not warrant a passing grade. If you ask me the legal representation took the most direct route to the objective. Sure the patrol got in and out but the patrol commander (Lead Plaintiff) allowed the navigator (MC) to conduct the patrol, the essential reconnaissance elements where never conducted therefore the mission is incomplete, fail.

As you know , regretablity I will not be in Halifax. I have sent my letters to the Judge ,but info surfaced after, which I couldnt address.

I wonder if someone there, can verbally ask my question in your words, or these please, as I feel strongly that something is amiss , or was missed in the Tax Neutrality Negotiations.

Q. Did Mcinnes Cooper Contact the, CRA, prior to accepting the 3.27% Notional Tax top up, in regards to the Tax Neutality issue. Specifically, to obtain details about the mechanism. Or the Finance dept, or other gouvernment, to request, or lobby for change,in regard to how the mechanism would function, on behalf of the class. Specifically how the mechanism would function, in regards to Zero Sums, with payments going back beyond 2 years.

In laymans terms Did the lawfirm research all aspects of the QRLSP workings and how the deemed taxes, would affect Long retroactive payments. and did they research, any past class action cases, that were similar, which had the taxes waived in theyre cases, and why we did not qualify for the same clause. Any answer so far from MC to me basically states they did do this , but the results dont seem to back that up.

Rags, I agree with you but i just have many doubts. I have submitted my letter to the judge and posted it on CSAT for all to see. I believe it to be an articulate arguement for why GOC should foot the legal fee and that is what i have asked for. Will it fall on deaf ears? I hope not but just feel like I am beating a dead horse.

they are going to hang on to it as long as possible... i think lawyers will see the benifit in interest.... fantastic have no doubt we just a bunch lazy tulips .. but they care for us

yup sapper I will be there, guest, I have had to start my speel over a few times. So after so mush waist of paper i've decided to becaume ecologicly sain and I will speek from the heart, I thank every body how has contributed to this forum, whether I agree or not does not mater. Collectivelly you have given me more insight into this mees than I could have hoped for. What I will say? i'l tell you after, Rags may be a pain for me but he has convinced me that we should go the hole 9 yards even if we are stiking into a void. Thanks again to all.

alis volat propriis

Georges are you going still?
Sapper

Thanks Guys, hopefully that other fellow was right when he said "Zero Sums" would be sorted out within 2 weeks, what do you guys think?

Oldvet....February 15, 2013

oldvet sparrow and others will be here with lap tops we will try to feed info as it comes out.