if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
+2
bigrex
Rags
6 posters
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
Yu got it RCN-Retired,
Smooth seas
Smooth seas
Rags- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 792
Location : Adrift
Registration date : 2013-01-06
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
God bless and God speed to all of those that will be in Halifax in two days. Your contribution is most appreciated, all of you, despite the so many differences of opinions that have been shared. The right to have opinions is something that as soldiers we have defended by the conflicts that we have endured in the name of peace. Ready Aye Ready.
RCN-Retired- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 263
Location : Vancouver Island
Registration date : 2012-11-14
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
Well put Bigrex
These guys are just the same site trolls as before we are just fighting 3 a day now compared to 1 day last week. Its same people. They will never use logic or go toe to toe with us using the law which tells everyone on site they are losers just causing crap
These guys are just the same site trolls as before we are just fighting 3 a day now compared to 1 day last week. Its same people. They will never use logic or go toe to toe with us using the law which tells everyone on site they are losers just causing crap
Rags- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 792
Location : Adrift
Registration date : 2013-01-06
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
I will be there on the 14th to be heard, and I'll try to be there on Friday but have appointments to attend as well.
bigrex- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 4064
Location : Halifax, Nova Scotia
Registration date : 2008-09-18
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
bigrex
I see that you are in Halifax. Will you be in the court on the 14th and 15th so you can let your views be known.
Tom
I see that you are in Halifax. Will you be in the court on the 14th and 15th so you can let your views be known.
Tom
meathead- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 95
Location : Nova Scoita
Registration date : 2012-09-27
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
R22R, you have stated that you are a zero sum client, but are you totally disabled? You talk about lifting Dennis into the air and driving from Ottawa to Halifax. Well I can tell you that not many people who are totally disabled are capable of either feat. I am totally disabled, but not a zero sum client, and the last time I drove any distance, 4 hours to NB, and then back but me in bed for several days unable to move. My point is, just because you are a zero sum client, it does not mean you are getting full retro and future payments, SISIP still has to decide on your case.
bigrex- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 4064
Location : Halifax, Nova Scotia
Registration date : 2008-09-18
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
Not stirring pot, do you think I like paying 17.5 , nope, but I believe the legal firm did a good job and good things cost money ! Do I think GOC should pay legal fees , yes, but will they, nope. Do I like paying taxes, nope, but I will pay like you will. If you take the deal its not bad nd you forget GOC I'd not have to pay retro
Guest- Guest
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
I pay 50000 in fees but I know legal is 17.5 percent, forget about 7.5 doesn't exist. We pay 17.5 is better than 30 percent. Taxes I wish nothing but GOC squeezes everyone. Taxes we fight GOC not lawyers, lawyers are good , Dennis is solid
Guest- Guest
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
it took 9 months for lawyers to perfectly word proposal ... but we only have 1 month to understand every word taken in 9 months and how it will affect
Guest- Guest
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
R22R
for someone who claims to have a degree then get into the books read the references we have placed here and you will see how fees are calculated on Class Actions. you keep showing you have not done any research on this by your comments. 30% was never in the cards after it went to class action and SISIP handed over value of settlement. Read the book please. You will find the legal fees are set by judge. The 30% is standard fee for actions that start but when then go to court judge will decide if its fair based on total class. In this case its what I said and that is right out of the guidlines the judge will use to decide what the fee is.
You are stirring the pot not us with your uneducated shots in the dark that have no basis in law..
for someone who claims to have a degree then get into the books read the references we have placed here and you will see how fees are calculated on Class Actions. you keep showing you have not done any research on this by your comments. 30% was never in the cards after it went to class action and SISIP handed over value of settlement. Read the book please. You will find the legal fees are set by judge. The 30% is standard fee for actions that start but when then go to court judge will decide if its fair based on total class. In this case its what I said and that is right out of the guidlines the judge will use to decide what the fee is.
You are stirring the pot not us with your uneducated shots in the dark that have no basis in law..
Rags- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 792
Location : Adrift
Registration date : 2013-01-06
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
i am paying 60,000 in fees what will make me satisfied is knowing all the answers.... it would be nice to have 100% understood on all my questions..
paying this amount and not knowing why is not my game
paying this amount and not knowing why is not my game
Guest- Guest
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
its not about the dollar amount for fees....R22R its about how we are being told.... and from what is being told alot of questions on interpretation comes up....... i want to undestand why 24 month retro with no future payments forced to be at 17.83 , i want to understand why people say no 24 months only being charged 7.5%... i want to understand why they dont just use 17.83 in the courts and what said to media..... i want to understand why i am forced on paying now on something i have not received... i want to know why they use hyperthetical logics on 7.5 and 7.5 and use 7.5... i dont care what lawyers getting in dollars... your right it couldve been 30% i want to know why they not just speaking 17.83 % terms...... once all this stuff is answered i will feel much better paying lawyers and feeling good about propsal .... i want to understand double talk in terms so i can come to a conclusion why things are done certain ways so i can add 2 and 2 and get answers we been all waiting for since gag lifted...... ITS NOT ABOUT THE MONEY , ITS ABOUT UNDERSTANDING
Guest- Guest
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
Signed 30 percent, law firm sent Dennis to another lawyer to see if agreement was fair, so know your facts. You are very wrong and when I get my settlement I will remember how wrong you are. Stop stirring shit just to pass time, call MC and Dennis and get the facts. Very great deal, most fair
Guest- Guest
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
Again stop showing your ignorance. Once the class hits a dollar value the 30 drops as per judges order read the law. It was never 30% when SISIP handed over the numbers awhile ago.
Rags- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 792
Location : Adrift
Registration date : 2013-01-06
Re: if its hypothetical lawyers using 7.5 and 7.5 and 2.83 to get 17.83 why in medias eye they only charging 7.5
Who cares, Do you all forget Dennis signed on the line for 30 percent? The law firm is charging us 17.5, this is almost half off ! What is the problem, really
Guest- Guest
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics
» Legal Fees (Assorted Topics)
» Aphria charging for soft gel cbd versus the plain old cbd oil ...
» When is the next Sit Rep from Lawyers?
» $50,000 dallors is NOT from the lawyers accounts it's from yours!
» Has Anybody heard Anything from the Lawyers or SISIP ????? I thought the GAG was over?
» Aphria charging for soft gel cbd versus the plain old cbd oil ...
» When is the next Sit Rep from Lawyers?
» $50,000 dallors is NOT from the lawyers accounts it's from yours!
» Has Anybody heard Anything from the Lawyers or SISIP ????? I thought the GAG was over?
Page 1 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum