Rights to Grieve
Page 1 of 1
Re: Rights to Grieve
When you signed the dotted line; you might as well of signed your body and mind away.. made forever payable to the GOC.
Dannypaj- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 1166
Age : 47
Location : Halifax
Registration date : 2015-01-29
Rights to Grieve
Interference with the right to grieve
The more we learn, the more we understand.
Grieving to the same system that is denying you?
Full disclosure eh!
They will use every little tidbit of information to deny or decrease what they rightfully should be paying you.
Full access, NFK.
Just as long as we are all receiving CCR.
Interference with the right to grieve
Section 29 of the National Defence Act grants every serving officer or non-commissioned member aggrieved by any decision, act or omission in the administration of the affairs of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) the right to submit a grievance to their commanding officer in the manner and in accordance with the conditions prescribed in regulations.
29 (1). RIGHT TO GRIEVE. An officer or non-commissioned member who has been aggrieved by any decision, act or omission in the administration of the affairs of the Canadian Forces for which no other process for redress is provided under this Act is entitled to submit a grievance.
Increasingly a CAF member who submit a grievance is asked to first sign a CONSENT FORM [see image] to release all of his “personal records, reports, documents or data, medical or hospital notes or notes connected with any medical treatment or counselling”. By providing such holus bolus consent a grievor authorizes all non-medically trained persons retained to review the grievance to consider, examine, appraise and evaluate any and all of his confidential healthcare information. In doing so, the grievor instantly loses actual control over the disclosure, access and use of his sensitive medical information that could result in substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness.
It should be unlawful to deny an individual a right provided by law because the said individual refuses to provide his consent to disclose the totality of his medical records, particularly when the grievance per se has nothing whatsoever to do with a medical issue. This highly prejudicial and abusive procedure which is detrimental to grievors has been brought to the attention of CAF authorities but to no avail.
http://globalmjreform.blogspot.ca/2016/06/interference-with-right-to-grieve.html?spref=fb
The more we learn, the more we understand.
Grieving to the same system that is denying you?
Full disclosure eh!
They will use every little tidbit of information to deny or decrease what they rightfully should be paying you.
Full access, NFK.
Just as long as we are all receiving CCR.
Interference with the right to grieve
Section 29 of the National Defence Act grants every serving officer or non-commissioned member aggrieved by any decision, act or omission in the administration of the affairs of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) the right to submit a grievance to their commanding officer in the manner and in accordance with the conditions prescribed in regulations.
29 (1). RIGHT TO GRIEVE. An officer or non-commissioned member who has been aggrieved by any decision, act or omission in the administration of the affairs of the Canadian Forces for which no other process for redress is provided under this Act is entitled to submit a grievance.
Increasingly a CAF member who submit a grievance is asked to first sign a CONSENT FORM [see image] to release all of his “personal records, reports, documents or data, medical or hospital notes or notes connected with any medical treatment or counselling”. By providing such holus bolus consent a grievor authorizes all non-medically trained persons retained to review the grievance to consider, examine, appraise and evaluate any and all of his confidential healthcare information. In doing so, the grievor instantly loses actual control over the disclosure, access and use of his sensitive medical information that could result in substantial harm, embarrassment, inconvenience, or unfairness.
It should be unlawful to deny an individual a right provided by law because the said individual refuses to provide his consent to disclose the totality of his medical records, particularly when the grievance per se has nothing whatsoever to do with a medical issue. This highly prejudicial and abusive procedure which is detrimental to grievors has been brought to the attention of CAF authorities but to no avail.
http://globalmjreform.blogspot.ca/2016/06/interference-with-right-to-grieve.html?spref=fb
Dannypaj- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 1166
Age : 47
Location : Halifax
Registration date : 2015-01-29
Similar topics
» History / Topics & Posted Articles
» Your Rights
» The case for a VAC ombudsman
» Vaccinations: Rights/Compensation
» Assorted Merged Stored Topics
» Your Rights
» The case for a VAC ombudsman
» Vaccinations: Rights/Compensation
» Assorted Merged Stored Topics
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum