So why legally were we, the zero sum clients, treated so differently during negotiations?
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Re: So why legally were we, the zero sum clients, treated so differently during negotiations?
On which level.
Too many to comment on
Too many to comment on
peep- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 843
Location : International Space Station (celibacy section)
Registration date : 2012-09-13
So why legally were we, the zero sum clients, treated so differently during negotiations?
I called SISIP give them my info as requested. Yet I ask myself why legally were we,
the zero sum clients, treated so differently during negotiations?
Any answers? Please enlighten me.
acerman1234
the zero sum clients, treated so differently during negotiations?
Any answers? Please enlighten me.
acerman1234
acerman1234- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 122
Location : London
Registration date : 2008-12-02
Similar topics
» History / Topics & Posted Articles
» next round of negotiations
» HAS THE QUESTION BEEN ANSWERED ................ IF THE RETROACTIVE PAYMENT IS FOR PAIN & SUFFERING , "" LEGALLY "" DO WE OWE THE TAXMAN A .... 40 % REBATE ON OUR MONEY ?
» "TIME LINE" concerning these SISIP negotiations
» Edit by Forum Master: Ongoing Negotiations: Dennis Made an Incorrect Statement about the Settlement. It is still being negotiated
» next round of negotiations
» HAS THE QUESTION BEEN ANSWERED ................ IF THE RETROACTIVE PAYMENT IS FOR PAIN & SUFFERING , "" LEGALLY "" DO WE OWE THE TAXMAN A .... 40 % REBATE ON OUR MONEY ?
» "TIME LINE" concerning these SISIP negotiations
» Edit by Forum Master: Ongoing Negotiations: Dennis Made an Incorrect Statement about the Settlement. It is still being negotiated
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum