QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
Re: QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
for more thoughts on this, go to "can you follow my thought' on the forum page, thanks all
puddleduk2- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 340
Location : Ontario
Registration date : 2012-10-15
Re: QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
Would that mean that once we receive our payment from SISIP, then invest this money and receive interest. Will this also be clawback as income because we defenatly did not receive interest income/money prior to release. Just a though. Some of us really do need the CPP(D) in order to let our children finish there schooling as we would never be able to make up the money that someone else can make without disability. All hogwash from this Old Sailor Boy
oldsailor- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 70
Location : Vancouver Island
Registration date : 2012-10-10
Re: QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
If my comment gave you any indication that I'm an idiot please excuse me, I am not!, my comments are meant to evoke dialogue, not decent, Thank You
Guest- Guest
Re: QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
PMED there is nothing in the fine print because the bold print clearly states 75% of your monthly CF salary.
If your scenario's of other income were a factor Peter would have brought them up in court. He DIDN'T because the policy, which he knows inside out, clearly and conciesly states CF SALARY.
Like i have said before there is some very intelligent people at the lawfirm and on this forum that know the policy THOUROUGHLY.
Please for your own health walk away from this idea.
If your scenario's of other income were a factor Peter would have brought them up in court. He DIDN'T because the policy, which he knows inside out, clearly and conciesly states CF SALARY.
Like i have said before there is some very intelligent people at the lawfirm and on this forum that know the policy THOUROUGHLY.
Please for your own health walk away from this idea.
Teentitan- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 3407
Location : ontario
Registration date : 2008-09-19
Re: QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
Policy is very clear, it is based on 75% of your monthly pay in effect on the date of your release from the CF. Therefore the CPP is not part of your CF salary.
Guest- Guest
Re: QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
PMED send your question to kristine.hunter@mcinnescooper.com Don't post it on the CSAT. SITREP's are sent to each member of the class via email and WILL NOT BE POSTED ON CSAT.
So please send your question, send me a pm and I will delete this topic. OK?
So please send your question, send me a pm and I will delete this topic. OK?
Teentitan- CSAT Member
- Number of posts : 3407
Location : ontario
Registration date : 2008-09-19
Re: QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
That was the argument I made with regards to receiving DVA pension while still serving. SISIP excluded it as income for determining my monthly earnings and then included it as earnings after my release, which reduced what they had to pay me prior to being zero'd out. WTF
Guest- Guest
Re: QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
Above question response from orig. Post
can you follow my thought
by puddleduk2 Today at 00:16
In my delirium I present a twisted thought,
When some of us were released we were already receiving CPP(D), for myself it was just over two years before my release date.
Our LTD SISIP coverage was to restore what we were making as total income the day after our release, minus CPP(D) and our CF Pension (and previously our PA amount).
My thought was my claimed income previous to my release included the CPP(D) amount as taxable income,
Even though SISIP currently deducts CPP(D) from our last income on release, shouldn't those in receipt of CPP(D) before their release be looked at as if it was part of their income on release, already established, not as an afterthought to reduce the liability of the plan.
thoughts anyone?
can you follow my thought
by puddleduk2 Today at 00:16
In my delirium I present a twisted thought,
When some of us were released we were already receiving CPP(D), for myself it was just over two years before my release date.
Our LTD SISIP coverage was to restore what we were making as total income the day after our release, minus CPP(D) and our CF Pension (and previously our PA amount).
My thought was my claimed income previous to my release included the CPP(D) amount as taxable income,
Even though SISIP currently deducts CPP(D) from our last income on release, shouldn't those in receipt of CPP(D) before their release be looked at as if it was part of their income on release, already established, not as an afterthought to reduce the liability of the plan.
thoughts anyone?
Guest- Guest
QUESTIONS FOR PETER FOR NEXT CLASS ACTION SIT REP
Is (SISIP) currently topping up to prelease amt, but deducting to current like CPP(D) VAC sources?
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Yet Again, Class Action Shows That Class Action Lawsuits Are Mostly About Making Lawyers Rich
» PETER DRISCOLL HAS IN FACT E-MAILED ME TO PASS ON THAT HE IS NOW IN POSSESSION OF ALL 7500 CLASS MEMBERS NAMES , THANK - YOU PETER , WELL DONE , FOR COUNTRY.......POST # 14 , HAS THE LATEST UPDATE FROM PETER DRISCOLL , HAVE A READ TROOPS......
» RCMP LTD Class Action and SISIP LTD Class Action
» Class Action
» AFTER ACTION REPORT SISIP CLASS ACTION
» PETER DRISCOLL HAS IN FACT E-MAILED ME TO PASS ON THAT HE IS NOW IN POSSESSION OF ALL 7500 CLASS MEMBERS NAMES , THANK - YOU PETER , WELL DONE , FOR COUNTRY.......POST # 14 , HAS THE LATEST UPDATE FROM PETER DRISCOLL , HAVE A READ TROOPS......
» RCMP LTD Class Action and SISIP LTD Class Action
» Class Action
» AFTER ACTION REPORT SISIP CLASS ACTION
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum