A Note From McInnes Cooper January 10, 2013

Is there no way that most, if not all of our returned claw-back, be back dated to the year entitled and deposited as income into an RRSP. It is being considered as income being subject to tax at source. At least a 30 percent contrubution should be allowed. I guess it is something else to take up with CCRA.

Tax tip, Supreme take your old ipad after its worn out on CSAT lol

LMAO His poor land fill site.

Tax Tip: Claim the depends that Nav needed yesterday morning when he was all over the place in csat.....

oh and MEDS

tax tip deduct floor pad because of safety requirement due to falling of chair while on CSAT

Tax tip....deduct internet usage costs associated with this case as we have had no lives except to be on line!!!!!!!!

Tax tip,,,,.deduct iPad cost for time used on CSAT looking for information!

Navrat wrote:It's the meds, please Peter, on behalf of all my fellow veterans , I believe the deal is good, call an emergency meeting with the judge, sign this , so we can carry on, F Foundry and me both agree, the sooner the better, signed, sealed and delivered, thanks,

As Dave Hester would say YUUUUUUP!

It's the meds, please Peter, on behalf of all my fellow veterans , I believe the deal is good, call an emergency meeting with the judge, sign this , so we can carry on, F Foundry and me both agree, the sooner the better, signed, sealed and delivered, thanks,

When I run the numbers, as given, I come out breaking even, not 'with interest'.

I accept the deal, but I just want you to know that I am not pleased that I am getting a 2003 dollar back at a 2012 rate.

$1 in 2003 = $1.25 today,
$1 in 2004 = $1.21 today,
$1 in 2005 = $1.17 today,
$1 in 2006 = $1.14 today,
$1 in 2007 = $1.11 today,
$1 in 2008 = $1.06 today,
$1 in 2009 = $1.07 today,
$1 in 2010 = $1.05 today,
$1 in 2011 = $1.02 today, and;
$1 in 2012 = $1.00 today.

So, as the settlement goes, I get $10 back, as I see it, I SHOULD get $11.08 back, but I'm not, and the Government of Canada knows this, Steven Harper knows this, Peter MacKay knows this, and every other elected official knows this, and every bureaucrat knows this, and they are ALL knowingly screwing us.

I will now 'go scratch my ass and get happy".

Tracker, I respect and appreciate what you are saying, that is why we went from 30% to 7.5% of the overall amount recovered, and it being paid out of the refund on a one time basis at 15%. Again the Court has the final say. All the best.

I will be back on the forum sometime tomorrow. Please feel free to email questions to address (it is easier than scrolling through the forum.)

Yah that little 3 ft tall guy from the PC party out side my window is beginning to get on my nerves, boy will he be pissed when I tell him I am on the second floor! LOL

F foundry wrote:I for one Know that they are being recorded or listened to she was very uneasy while I was talking to her she tried to be nice but you could tell there was some thing off. just my impresion could be meds

LOL, could be the meds, good one!

Peter ... i understand that it is the fairest way for you to apply the refund.

What bothers me is that in principle we are having a percentage taken from our going forward payments. What I personally would have been perfectly fine with is if the firm would have said "These Vets have been through enough. Why don't we just take a percentage of the retro we got back for them and leave their future montly payments alone".